The northern frontier of Roman Britain just added an unexpected data point, and it is shoe size. Archaeologists at Magna Roman Fort have uncovered leather footwear that is unusually large for the period, in some cases longer than 12 inches, with one example measuring roughly 12.8 inches.
The scale of the discovery stands out in Roman archaeology and raises fresh questions about who was wearing what on Hadrian’s Wall. The find is not a one-off.
From the season’s assemblage at Magna, about a quarter of the shoes exceed 11.8 inches, while a nearby site, Vindolanda, shows only a tiny fraction of supersized examples in its long-studied collection. That contrast invites careful comparison rather than quick conclusions.
Dr Elizabeth Greene, Associate Professor at Western University and the Vindolanda Trust’s footwear specialist, and Dr Andrew Birley, CEO and Director of Excavations at the Vindolanda Trust, are among the researchers interpreting the new material.
Roman footwear usually mirrors modern feet more than myths suggest, which is why Magna’s outliers get attention. Eight shoes longer than 11.8 inches have been logged so far this season, including the current Trust record at about 12.8 inches, taken from a defensive ditch just outside the fort wall.
What explains the upsizing here but not next door at Vindolanda, where more than 5,000 Roman shoes have been cataloged over decades of work.
One hypothesis is a garrison or community with different body types or supply habits, but the data set is still small and under conservation, so restraint is wise.
Shoes are not just sizes and soles. Roman cobblers built layers of cowhide into sturdy platform shoes and pegged them with iron hobnails, so the outsole gripped and lasted on rough surfaces, which helps archaeologists read use, wear and gait.
When leather survives with seams, thongs, and nail patterns, it can point to workshop traditions, supply routes, and even rank or role within a unit or household. Those are testable lines of inquiry at Magna as conservation advances.
The shoes survive because the ditch fills at Magna have been at least partly anaerobic, meaning oxygen was limited and decay slowed way down.
Low oxygen, high groundwater, and fine sediments together create preservation pockets where organic finds hang on for centuries.
Those conditions also seal in fragile traces of daily life, like insect parts, seeds, and parasite eggs.
The team at Vindolanda, just a short walk east along the frontier, previously recovered roundworm and whipworm eggs from drain sediments linked to a latrine, which adds a health dimension to material culture studies.
The same chemistry that protects leather can be undone by drying soils, fluctuating water tables, and shifts in oxidation reduction potential (ORP).
Site monitoring on Hadrian’s Wall has documented the vulnerability of waterlogged archaeology to modern weather patterns, which is a polite way of saying that climate variability can accelerate loss of information in a single hot, dry season.
At Vindolanda, scientists have paired portable X-ray fluorescence with microbial DNA surveys to track how buried conditions shape preservation.
That work provides a technical baseline for interpreting the state of organic artefacts and for planning how to stabilize deposits before they turn aerobic and start crumbling.
“We can only celebrate and marvel at the diversity and differences of these people if we can still see them in the archaeological data we gather today,” said Birley, pointing to the bigger picture that sits behind a single large sole.
Conservators expect modest shrinkage during treatment, so final measurements may tick down a hair.
Even so, the current proportions already push the edges of Roman footwear known from Britain and justify careful comparison to the long-run dataset at Vindolanda.
Wear patterns, nail layouts, and any surviving uppers will help distinguish winter boots from everyday shoes, and medical padding from sizing differences.
Context matters, so associated pottery and construction phases inside the fort will anchor the footwear in time and use.
Hadrian’s Wall is famous for stone and turf, but its quieter story is the organic record below the grass. When that record holds together, it can show how soldiers and families shopped, worked, walked, and stayed warm, right down to what got tracked through a doorway.
That is why Magna’s ditch fills matter beyond a headline about big feet. They give archaeologists more than a snapshot, they give a sequence of choices across seasons and supplies that we cannot reconstruct from pottery alone.
Archaeologists are also looking for tiny traces in the same layers, since these deposits can contain important health-related evidence.
Paleoparasitology integrates microscope work with site context to trace infections across time and place, and it already has a track record in Roman Britain.
At Vindolanda, the latrine drain eggs confirmed gastrointestinal infections that were widespread across the empire, a pattern echoed by independent studies of Roman sanitation and parasite prevalence. That kind of evidence sits in the same micro-environments that keep leather intact.
The simplest next step is the hardest: patient conservation, measurement, and context-by-context analysis.
Only then will the statistics settle enough to test whether Magna’s footwear points to taller people, different supply chains, or colder kit.
Meanwhile, the preservation question will not wait forever. Keeping ditch fills wet and low in oxygen is not just a technical preference, it is the condition that keeps this period’s most personal artefacts readable at all.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–